Dynamic layout planning using a hybrid incremental solution method

Zouein, P P and Tommelein, I D (1999) Dynamic layout planning using a hybrid incremental solution method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(6), pp. 400-408. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Efficiently using site space to accommodate resources throughout the duration of a construction project is a critical problem. It is termed the `dynamic layout pinning' problem. Solving it involves creating a sequence of layouts that span the entire project duration, given resources, the timing of their presence on site, their changing demand for space over time, constraints on their location, and costs for their relocation. A dynamic layout construction procedure is presented here. Construction resources, represented as rectangles, are subjected to two-dimensional geometric constraints on relative locations. The objective is to allow site space to all resources so that no spatial conflicts arise, while keeping distance-based adjacency and relocation costs minimal. The solution is constructed stepwise for consecutive time frames. For each resource, selected heuristically one at a time, constraint satisfaction is used to compute sets of feasible positions. Subsequently, a linear program is solved to find the optimal position for each resource so as to minimize all costs. The resulting sequence of layouts is suboptimal in terms of the stated global objective, but the algorithm helps the layout planner explore better alternative solutions.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: planner, presence, duration, satisfaction, construction project, program, relocation
Subjects: software systems, production management, market analysis, project controls, profession, project delivery, environmental science
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here