AbdelRazig, Y A and Chang, L M (2000) Intelligent model for constructed facilities surface assessment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(6), pp. 422-432. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Computerized intelligent systems can simulate human expertise as well as analyze and process vast amounts of data instantaneously. This paper presents a hybrid intelligent computerized model for constructed facilities surface quality assessment. The model uses computers to analyze digital images of the areas to be assessed to identify and measure defects. Moreover, neural networks are used to train the system to automate the process and replicate the experts' knowledge in identifying the defects. Most techniques, currently used in construction quality assessment, rely mostly on subjective criteria. The model applies digital image processing and neural network techniques for constructed facilities surface quality assessment to make the process objective, quantitative, consistent, and reliable. Highway steel bridge coating assessment was used to exemplify the generic model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | intelligent system, image processing, quality assessment, neural network, coating, construction quality |
| Subjects: | computer vision, automation and robotics, quality assurance, building materials, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Quality Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here