Alhazmi, T and McCaffer, R (2000) Project procurement system selection model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(3), pp. 176-184. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In the last two decades, there have been significant changes in the technical and economic conditions prevailing in the construction industry. To overcome the shortcomings of the traditional procurement methods, the construction industry has developed a large number of different procurement systems. A systematic approach for selection of the most appropriate system is now needed. This paper presents the development of the project procurement system selection model (PPSSM), which integrates the techniques of the analytic hierarchy process and Parker's judging alternative technique of value engineering into a multicriteria multiscreening system. A survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia with the aim of testing the PPSSM for effectiveness and efficiency and assisting the governmental agencies to select the most appropriate procurement system for implementation of their projects. For this purpose, a questionnaire was developed. On the basis of the synthesis process of the PPSSM, Saudi public clients selected design and build as the most appropriate procurement system for their projects, with an overall priority of 0.496. The outcome of the study demonstrates the effectiveness of PPSSM in helping the client in the construction industry to choose the procurement system that fulfills the needs of the client and the project requirements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | survey, value engineering, questionnaire, project procurement, design and build, agency, Saudi Arabia, economic condition, efficiency, traditional procurement, procurement system, effectiveness, public client, testing, construction industry, implementation |
| Subjects: | Geography, performance management, industry analysis, sociology, value management, data collection methods, economic analysis, professional practice, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here