Defining triangular probability distributions from historical cost data

Back, W E; Boles, W W and Fry, G T (2000) Defining triangular probability distributions from historical cost data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(1), pp. 29-37. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

During the development of an automated cost estimating system, several factors led to the selection of the triangular probability-density function to model historical construction costs. The triangular-density function is customarily used when function parameters are directly estimated by experts. A typical example is for estimating activity durations by identifying a minimum value, a most likely value, and a maximum value. These values are then used to construct triangular-density functions to represent uncertain activity durations. For this work, however, it was necessary to estimate parameters of the triangular-density function using historical cost data. A methodology was developed to generate test data and compare three methods of parameter estimation - maximum likelihood, moment matching, and least-squares curve-fitting techniques. It is concluded that optimized moment matching and least-squares techniques produce more accurate parameter estimates, while maximum likelihood estimation yields less accurate results. It is further concluded that the least-squares minimization method always performed as well as or better than the optimized moment matching technique and was therefore selected as the method of choice for the project.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: estimate, duration, estimation, probability distribution, construction cost, historical cost data, density, estimating, parameter-estimation, methodology, minimization, cost estimating
Subjects: project controls, statistical analysis, algorithms, research methods, financial and cost management, analytical methods, economic analysis
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Time Control, Digital Applications, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here