Khosrowshahi, F (2002) Project cost-time optimal solutions. In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.
Abstract
There have been several research works into the examination of the relationship between project total cost and total duration. To this end, the activity crashing technique stands out as an intricate, comprehensive and complex method for evaluating various cost-time scenarios. The technique can be used to identify the optimal solution: the project duration that yields the least project cost. However, what is regarded optimal for the contractor is likely to render a non-optimal solution for the client, and vice versa. Subsequently, depending on their priorities, the contractor and the client could examine a number of compromised solutions ranging between the 'least favourable solution' for the contractor, to the 'least favourable solution' to the client. Mathematical models are offered which represent the 'least compromise solution' and 'equal compromise solution'. In the case of 'least compromise solution', the total sum of compromises by both parties is minimized. Whereas, in the case of the 'equal compromise solution', both parties agree to compromise by an equal amount.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | activity crashing; optimal solution; project cost-time; mathematical modelling |
| Index terms: | duration, mathematical modelling, crashing, project cost, mathematical model |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, analytical methods, economics, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here