Carr, R I (2000) Construction congestion cost (CO3) traffic impact and construction cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(2), pp. 114-121. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The Construction Congestion Cost System (CO3) is an integrated set of tools to estimate impact of traffic maintenance contract provisions on congestion, road user cost, and construction cost. Engineers use CO3 to produce realistic budgets and select practical contracting methods that provide an acceptable balance between construction cost and congestion. This paper demonstrates computation of impacts associated with alternative methods of maintaining traffic during construction. The Routes Sheet computes equivalent average vehicle routes for complex diversion routes. The Input Sheet provides for documentation of vehicle and route inputs and computes user cost for individual trips through the work zone, diversions, and cancellations. The Traffic Sheet computes daily traffic impacts and user costs for each construction method. The Construction Sheet computes impact of different construction methods on construction costs. The Impact Sheet summarizes daily impacts and computes total project traffic impacts, road user costs, and construction costs for all alternatives. These tools provide practical information with which engineers select construction methods whose impacts are acceptable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | contracting method, documentation, maintenance contract, construction cost, construction method, computation, engineer, estimate, traffic impact |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, maintenance engineering, contractual arrangements, professional development, profession, building construction, computational methods, transportation engineering |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Information Management, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here