Dunston, P S and Bernold, L E (2000) Adaptive control for safe and quality rebar fabrication. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(2), pp. 122-129. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Rebar fabrication is a labor intensive operation that uses scrap or 'trash' steel for raw materials and therefore can benefit greatly from improvements in safety, productivity, and quality. Shared control through a human-machine interface may be the best alternative for achieving highest quality standards and improving worker performance in safety and productivity. This paper develops a control scheme for automated rebar bending within the framework of computer integrated construction and presents research focused on the task level control to compensate for springback in the bent rebar. Three major problems are addressed: (1) Conception of a hierarchical computer integrated construction control structure that links rebar fabrication to the other construction project functions: (2) comparative evaluation of alternative algorithms for prediction of springback; and (3) portability of a springback control model that uses real-time electronic sensing. Bending tests were conducted with both a laboratory prototype and an actual shop table bender to experiment with alternative models for in-process springback prediction including a neural network model. Limitations in control system portability were realized in the transfer from the laboratory prototype bender to the shop bender. Springback model evaluations revealed that empirical statistical models, neural networks, and in-process relaxation performed equally well.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | control system, construction project, laboratory, experiment, prototype, neural network, rebar, fabrication, statistical model, quality standard, productivity |
| Subjects: | management, manufacturing engineering, production management, monitoring and control, research management, quality assurance, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, building materials, artificial intelligence, data science |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here