Adapting lift-slab technology to construct submerged pile caps

Elazouni, A M and Abd El-Razek, M E (2000) Adapting lift-slab technology to construct submerged pile caps. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(2), pp. 149-157. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Many techniques are used in practice to construct underwater foundations, including caissons and piled foundations. The main challenge of underwater construction is cutting off water seepage so as to always provide dry working conditions. Water seepage can be eliminated by continually pressurizing inside caissons and dewatering the intercepted space of sheet-pile cofferdams. Although these methods alleviate water seepage, they have negative aspects, including unhygienic working conditions and elevated costs. This paper presents a method to partly construct the submerged pile caps above water, sink to place, and complete work in totally dry working conditions. This method adapts the lift-slab technology to lower the pile cap to the underwater permanent position. Only activities necessary to make the pile cap monolithic with the pile group are achieved after the cap is lowered in secured dry working conditions. This method was used successfully in many bridges on the Nile River in Egypt during the last decade. The method is illustrated in this paper along with the problems encountered during construction. Finally, the method is evaluated and compared with other methods.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: cofferdam, Egypt, caisson, working conditions, foundations
Subjects: structural engineering, employment law, geotechnical engineering, Geography
Topics: Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here