Algorithm for scheduling with multiskilled constrained resources

Hegazy, T; Shabeeb, A K; Elbeltagi, E and Cheema, T (2000) Algorithm for scheduling with multiskilled constrained resources. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(6), pp. 414-421. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Scheduling with constrained resources, particularly skilled labor, is a major challenge for almost all construction projects. In the literature, various techniques have been developed to reduce consequent project delay of constrained resources. Most of these techniques assume single-skilled resources and use heuristic rules to decide which activity will receive the resource first and which ones to delay. To improve existing solutions, this paper introduces some modifications to heuristic resource-scheduling solutions, considering multiskilled resources. The proposed approach stores and utilizes information about the resource(s) that can be substituted when there is a shortage in another one. Using this information, less utilized resources can be combined to substitute the shortages in constrained resources during the shortage period, taking into consideration the loss in work productivity. To automate the proposed algorithm, a macroprogram has been written on a commercial scheduling software. An example application is presented to show the improved results of the proposed approach over existing heuristics. The use of the proposed approach as a better resource management tool within the construction industry is then discussed.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: skilled labour, scheduling, construction project, shortages, project delay, heuristic, productivity, construction industry, resource management
Subjects: management, production management, project controls, industry analysis, risk assessment, control systems, operations research, economic analysis
Topics: Time Control, Human Resources, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here