Koch, C and Marton, J (2002) Implementing multiskilled teams on the construction site: Developing a scandinavian model? In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.
Abstract
Teamwork in construction has a long history and it’s nevertheless considered a contemporary organizational innovation. Groups of craftsmen working in teams has for long been the fundamental work organization unit on the Danish sites, whilst multiskilled teams have only for the last few years been considered a tool for further flexibilization and efficiency. The paper presents experiences with multiskilled teams within urban renewal projects in Denmark, but also relates about US cases that use multiskilling as a new labour strategy on the sites. A two dimensional typology of the characteristics of multiskilled teams is presented. One is focusing on the process of establishing the team, another on the content of the new work organization characterized by governance, technical and normative dimensions, drawing on Findlay et al., 2000 framework. The team establishing process is characterized by project and change management, degree of involvement and inclusion, training and gaining resources. Case material from three state-funded demonstration Danish projects is used to analyse how potential barriers for reorganizing was overcome in the process. Cooperation with unions, training, and the design of one central site and logistic team, proves crucial. A chief barrier in Danish construction is that working in a multiskilled manner still is a very limited general skill. But segregation of design and execution also produce problems. Finally, it is discussed whether the contemporary innovation of multiskilling is a Scandinavian model of employee empowerment and participation (so-called strong teams), and /or represents a management driven innovation in prolongation of Japanese ideas of teamwork (so-called weak teams).
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | multiskilling; scandinavian approach; site management |
| Index terms: | governance, strategy, dimension, history, urban renewal, change management, employee empowerment, organizational innovation, craft worker, cooperation, construction site, drawing, teamwork, efficiency, Denmark, site management |
| Subjects: | post-disaster and reconstruction, business, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, architectural and construction history, management, technical documentation, performance management, practitioner, Geography, construction operations, work location |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Site Management, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Governance, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Human Resources, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here