Hinze, J and Wilson, G (2000) Moving toward a zero injury objective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(5), pp. 399-403. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In the past decade the terms `zero accidents' and `zero injuries' have been used a great deal by construction firms espousing their commitment to safety. Studies have shown that many construction firms, especially those in the industrial sector, have enjoyed significant improvements in their safety performances. These performance statistics have been considerably better than those of the overall construction industry and provide clear testimony of the effectiveness of efforts to improve safety. Although safety performances have been impressive among many of these firms, a study was conducted to see if additional improvements could be made. The study was conducted with a selected group of large, primarily industrial, firms to determine if any changes had been made since the Construction Industry Institute publicized its findings on effective means to improve safety performance. Results show that additional changes have been made by many of these firms and that the benefits were also realized. Safety performances have improved since these additional safety practices have been implemented. The implication is that firms with good safety records can still make improvements by implementing specific safety practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | Construction Industry Institute, statistics, construction industry, effectiveness, commitment, construction firm, injury, safety performance |
| Subjects: | performance management, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, research organizations, organization, mathematical modelling, psychology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here