Kannan, G and Vorster, M (2000) Development of an experience database for truck loading operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(3), pp. 201-209. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Planning and estimating earthmoving operations rely on the ability to collect field data and analyze operations. Two recent developments have dramatically changed the methods used and the results obtained in this process. The first relates to data collection where instrumentation placed on loading and hauling units can replace stopwatches as a primary source of data. The second relates to analysis where simulation techniques can replace deterministic job studies. This paper reviews these developments and shows that data collection and analysis techniques must complement each other. The use of stopwatches may satisfy the requirements of job studies but does not satisfy those of simulation. Simulation requires knowledge of the variance associated with the activity duration. Obtaining it from a few data points collected using stopwatches is frequently statistically incomplete. Simulation requires a continuous form of data collection to support its modeling process and, hence, offers new challenges to the data collection methods. Instrumented vehicles present a viable opportunity to collect continuous field data. However, the data collected using the instrumented vehicles must be characterized in such a way to reflect the actual job conditions under which they were recorded. As a result, this research extends the concept of data collection to building an experience database. Field data and visualization techniques are presented in this paper to illustrate the concept of the experience database.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | loading, duration, modelling, earthmoving, database, instrumentation, variance, estimating, visualization |
| Subjects: | measurement and scaling, project controls, data management, design practice, analytical methods, financial and cost management, construction operations |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here