Automated rebar constructability diagnosis

Navon, R; Shapira, A and Shechori, Y (2000) Automated rebar constructability diagnosis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(5), pp. 389-397. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In spite of impressive progress in project modeling and computer-integrated construction, there is little real integration - manual or computerized - between design and construction of building projects. Consequently, constructability problems are experienced during the construction phase. With regard to rebar, constructability problems are discovered either after casting the reinforced concrete element or not at all, resulting in a weaker element. This paper describes a rebar constructability model, which was developed in an object-oriented graphic environment. The model is intended to be used during the design phase to automatically diagnose potential rebar-related constructability problems (the Diagnosis Module), as well as to offer solutions and implement them (the Correction Module). Of these two modules, the Diagnosis Module was implemented in a concept-proving prototype. The proposed model searches for constructability problems through all relevant parts of the building. This search includes the structural design, as well as other building systems (e.g., sanitary, drainage, HVAC). The model also checks for potential collisions between reinforcement bars and temporary inserts (e.g., form ties). Thus, in addition to the resulting increased constructability, the model also has potential as a system coordination tool.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: reinforcement, building system, rebar, design and construction, design phase, module, modelling, constructability, construction phase, coordination, integration, reinforced concrete, drainage, structural design, prototype
Subjects: organizational analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, construction integration, management, architectural elements, modelling and simulation, building materials, project delivery, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, professional practice, architectural engineering, engineering systems
Topics: Procurement, Project Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here