Seo, J; Haas, C T; Saidi, K and Sreenivasan, S V (2000) Graphical control interface for construction and maintenance equipment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(3), pp. 210-218. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper discusses graphical interfaces to improve equipment control in construction and facility/ infrastructure maintenance environments. Most large construction and maintenance machines are difficult to control because of insufficient visual feedback to equipment operators. In many emerging applications such as hazardous waste cleaning, it is also necessary to control such equipment from a distance using teleoperation techniques. Initial evidence indicates that real-time updated graphical representation of equipment and work environments can enhance equipment control by providing better spatial perception to the equipment operator. Real-time simulation and task planning with graphical models can also ensure safe and reliable operation of equipment. However, graphical control interfaces require careful design for successful results as it is very difficult to generate exact graphical models of unstructured and dynamic environments such as construction and maintenance. Design of graphical control interfaces for construction equipment also requires knowledge in various technological areas. In this paper, design issues and principles for graphical control interfaces for construction and maintenance equipment are presented. The usefulness of graphical control interfaces is also presented through performance tests of a teleoperated clinker clearing robot for power plant maintenance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | work environment, cleaning, graphical representation, construction equipment, power plant, evidence |
| Subjects: | construction equipment, management, maintenance engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, evaluation and assessment methods, visualization |
| Topics: | Plant and Equipment, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here