Application example for evaluating networks considering correlation

Wang, W C and Demsetz, L A (2000) Application example for evaluating networks considering correlation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(6), pp. 467-474. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Current approaches to network scheduling do not consider the correlation between activity durations. When activity durations are correlated, the variability of path and project durations may be increased. High variability in a project's duration increases the uncertainty of completing the project by a target date. The model NETCOR (NETworks under CORrelated uncertainty) has been developed to evaluate schedule networks when activity durations are correlated. The NETCOR model builds upon a factor-based procedure to indirectly elicit correlation. An activity duration model disaggregates the effect of uncertainty by factors from a duration distribution (grandparent) for each activity. Correlation is captured by a child-distribution approach that further breaks down the factor-subdistribution (parent) based on the factor conditions. This paper demonstrates the practical application of NETCOR to a current construction project. Using the same inputs, the program evaluation and review technique and several simulation analyses that do not consider correlation also are evaluated. Comparison of the results shows the significance of considering correlation in scheduling analysis.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: construction project, network scheduling, scheduling, duration, programme evaluation and review technique, variability, simulation analysis
Subjects: design analysis, operations research, project controls, statistical analysis, production management
Topics: Project Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here