Evaluation of drug testing in the workplace: Study of the construction industry

Gerber, J K and Yacoubian G.S, Jr (2001) Evaluation of drug testing in the workplace: Study of the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(6), pp. 438-444. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

During the past two decades, drug testing in the workplace has gone from virtual nonexistence to widespread employer acceptance. This growth is particularly critical for the construction industry. High rates of alcohol and other drug use, coupled with the high-risk, safety-sensitive nature of the industry, have prompted the implementation of a variety of drug surveillance and prevention strategies. Despite this growing vigilance, however, no scholarly works have examined the impact of drug-related policies in the construction industry. The present study investigates the efficacy of workplace drug-testing programs in reducing injury incident rates and workers' compensation experience-rating modification factors within the construction industry. Analyses indicate that companies with drug-testing programs experienced a 51% reduction in incident rates within 2 years of implementation. Furthermore, companies that drug test their employees experienced a significant reduction in their workers' compensation experience-rating modified factors. Policy implications are discussed in light of the current findings.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: strategy, injury, alcohol, surveillance, program, testing, construction industry, prevention, implementation, compensation, policy implication
Subjects: psychology, contractual arrangements, professional practice, policy studies, dispute resolution, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, management, software systems, monitoring and control systems, financial risk
Topics: Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Governance
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here