Kululanga, G K; Kuotcha, W; McCaffer, R and Edum-Fotwe, F (2001) Construction contractors' claim process framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(4), pp. 309-314. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The management of construction claims is the greatest challenge that is facing contractors in today's vacillating business environment. Construction projects are becoming increasingly susceptible to a variety of factors that give rise to time extension and cost recovery. Although the construction business environment has moved toward partnering arrangements in recent years, the number of contractual difficulties continue to rise. Thus, the construction industry needs to develop methodologies for construction claim management that should overcome their current problems. While some practitioners have been using some kind of a procedure for claim management process framework measuring tool, a written exposition of such an instrument is not widely available in the literature. This paper presents the principles that underly construction claim process and gives a generic framework that aims at facilitating measurement of construction claim process as one of the strategies for improving construction business processes. It also presents a survey of Malawian construction contractors' performance on the construction claim process framework. The results show a low awareness of such a construction claim process-measuring instrument.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | strategy, survey, construction project, methodology, measuring instrument, practitioner, construction contractor, construction claim, partnering, recovery, becoming, claim management, construction industry |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, contractual condition, production management, payment, partnership management, industry analysis, philosophical process, data collection methods, practitioner, operations management, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here