Just-in-time management of precast concrete components

Pheng, L S and Chuan, C J (2001) Just-in-time management of precast concrete components. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(6), pp. 494-501. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The just-in-time (JIT) philosophy has tremendous potential for managing the movement of precast concrete components from the prefabrication yard to, and within, the construction site. The space constraints for storage and the traffic congestion at the worksite can then be alleviated. By means of a survey and interviews, this paper helps a precast concrete supplier examine if contractors are ready to adopt the JIT philosophy for receiving and installing precast concrete components on-site. Lessons are drawn from the empirical findings to determine how contractors can prepare for JIT management of precast concrete components. The findings suggest that the contractors are, by and large, obscured by price and have generally overlooked the bigger picture of total costs. Only a minority of the respondents show an interest in JIT deliveries as a cost-saving management system. Conversely, the precasters are better prepared to provide logistical support for JIT deliveries. In this context, reimbursement of costs or sharing of the savings can help to motivate the precasters to commit to JIT deliveries.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: traffic congestion, just-in-time, construction site, management system, movement, prefabrication, savings, philosophy, minority, interview, survey, precast concrete
Subjects: health behaviours and lifestyles, work location, building construction, transportation engineering, building materials, data collection methods, philosophical studies, management, lean logistics, economic analysis, sociology
Topics: Organizational Design, Ethics, Construction Technology, Construction Materials, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Supply Chain Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here