Physiological demands during construction work

Abdelhamid, T S and Everett, J G (2002) Physiological demands during construction work. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), pp. 427-437. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Notwithstanding the use of earthmoving equipment, cranes, and other machinery, physically strenuous and demanding tasks remain endemic to the construction industry. This research was motivated by the need to investigate the physical demands of construction work and to evaluate whether these physical demands are excessive. Physiological measures of energy expenditure, including oxygen consumption and heart rate data, were collected for 100 construction workers performing typical construction work. The average oxygen uptake for the measured construction activities was 0.82 L·min-1 (±0.22 L·min-1), and the average heart rate for the measured construction activities was 108 beats ·min-1 (±17 beats ·min-1). The measured data were evaluated against published guidelines for acceptable levels of physical performance in industrial settings indicating that a significant number of craft workers (20 to 40%) routinely exceed these physiological thresholds. The results clearly point to the need to promote and apply concepts of work physiology at the workplace to better the occupational health and safety of the construction workforce. This paper developed the foundation for further applied research regarding the physical demands of construction work.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; occupational health; research
Index terms: consumption, occupational health, occupational health and safety, construction worker, construction industry, heart, earthmoving, construction work, work physiology, construction activity, energy-expenditure
Subjects: medical science and clinical practice, occupational health, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, consumer economics, practitioner, energy systems, construction operations, operations management
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here