Representing work spaces generically in construction method models

Akinci, B; Fischer, M; Kunz, J and Levitt, R (2002) Representing work spaces generically in construction method models. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(4), pp. 296-305. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction activities require a set of work spaces to be executed safely and productively. The locations and volumes of these spaces change in three dimensions and across time, according to project-specific design and schedule information. Previous research on construction space management requires users to specify the spatio-temporal data necessary to represent each project-specific space needed for construction. Since a construction schedule consists of hundreds of activities requiring multiple types of spaces, this approach is practically infeasible. There is a need for a generic (project-independent) representation of work spaces, from which the project-specific instances of spaces can be derived automatically based on project-specific design and construction schedule information. This paper formalizes such a generic space description as a computer-interpretable ontology. This ontology is general, reusable, and comprehensive. A prototype system developed uses this ontology to capture the spatial requirements associated with construction methods and to automate the generation of project-specific spaces represented in three dimensions and across time.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; construction methods; scheduling; workspace
Index terms: scheduling, prototype, construction method, ontology, construction activity, workspace, design and construction, dimension
Subjects: education and knowledge transfer, management, building construction, health monitoring assessment and metrics, contractual arrangements, construction operations, operations research, modelling and simulation
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here