Achieving multiple project objectives through contingency management

Ford, D N (2002) Achieving multiple project objectives through contingency management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(1), pp. 30-39. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Project managers use budgets to satisfy multiple objectives such as cost control, short durations, and high quality. Contingency funds are included in project budgets to manage risk and achieve project goals. Understanding how managers use budget contingencies requires a dynamic information processing model of how managers bridge the gap between high project complexity and limited managerial capacity. The results of collecting contingency management practices of real estate development project managers is reported and a dynamic simulation model of contingency management described. The model is used to test hypotheses of the effectiveness of aggressive and passive management strategies on cost, timeliness, and facility value. Managers were found to pursue general project objectives in their management of contingency. An aggressive strategy was found to be more robust but performed poorer than a passive strategy. Conclusions include the prevalence of trade-offs between robust and high-performance contingency management policies in construction projects and the importance of incorporating uncertainty into project planning and management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: budgeting; contingency; cost control; project management
Index terms: project complexity, project planning, real estate development, project management, duration, cost control, management practice, information processing, effectiveness, strategy, budgeting, manager, project manager, construction project, management strategy
Subjects: data science, profession, organizational theory, project management theory and practice, production management, economic development, financial and cost management, management, control systems, performance management, practitioner, financial management, project controls
Topics: Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Urban Studies, Time Control, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here