Ling, Y Y (2002) Model for predicting performance of architects and engineers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), pp. 446-455. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Certain attributes of an architect or engineer (AE) may be used to predict his performance. These attributes may be categorized as "hard" or "soft" attributes. Hard attributes include an AE's cognitive ability, job knowledge, task proficiency, and job experience. Soft attributes include an AE's conscientiousness, initiative, social skills, controllability, and commitment. The purpose of this study is to identify those attributes that affect an AE's performance, and to construct a model to predict his performance in design build (DB) projects. Twenty five attributes were generated using the hierarchy tree. The importance of these attributes was tested with designer/builders who select and hire AEs, using a standard questionnaire. A statistical test showed that 24 of these attributes are significantly important. Thirty AEs were evaluated by experienced designer/builders (experts) who have worked with them in completed DB projects. Besides giving a global performance score of the AE (dependent variable), each expert also evaluated the AE on the degree to which they exhibited the important attributes (independent variables). Based on these ratings, an optimum multiple regression performance prediction model was obtained. To validate the model, another group of experts used the optimum model to evaluate 18 other AEs. The resulting performance score as calculated by the model was compared to the global performance scores awarded by the designer/builders. This validation process showed the model to be robust. The results of the study reveal that an AE's performance can be predicted by using just three attributes: AE's problem solving ability and project approach, AE's speed in producing design drawings, and the AE's level of enthusiasm in tackling a difficult assignment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architect/engineers; design/build; performance evaluation; regressional models |
| Index terms: | validation, statistical test, multiple-regression, engineer, designer, design drawing, performance evaluation, builder, performance prediction, independent variable, cognitive ability, architect, problem solving, questionnaire, dependent variable, commitment, design build |
| Subjects: | cognitive psychology, psychology, statistical analysis, profession, data collection methods, decision-making and reasoning, contractual arrangements, technical documentation, performance measurement, practitioner, performance management, professional development |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Information Management, Procurement, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here