2000 Peurifoy lecture: Construction practices in developing countries

Thomas, H R (2002) 2000 Peurifoy lecture: Construction practices in developing countries. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(1), pp. 1-7. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Many contractors are expanding into global markets. Further, many owners procure construction services to build facilities in developing countries. The construction practices in these countries differ in important respects from practices in industrialized countries. This paper reviews some of the more significant differences in construction practices in developing countries. Five primary factors are discussed: cost of labor, cost of money, technology and methods, infrastructure, and role of the design professional. The hypothesis is presented that the main driving factors affecting construction practices are the cost of labor and the cost of money. These two factors place speed of construction as a secondary objective. Low labor costs lead to construction practices being labor-intensive. There is a distinct absence of construction equipment, especially small lifting devices used for material handling. Additionally, the lack of infrastructure means that many materials commonly purchased in the United States from a vendor are fabricated using on-site labor in developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction methods; developing countries; foreign projects
Index terms: markets, labour cost, owner, construction equipment, material handling, lifting, construction method, United States, developing country
Subjects: economic analysis, product delivery, development economics, construction equipment, Geography, cost management, sociology, building construction, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Plant and Equipment, International Construction, Supply Chain Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here