Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle

Thomas, H R; Horman, M J; De Souza, U E L and Zavřski, I (2002) Reducing variability to improve performance as a lean construction principle. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(2), pp. 144-154. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Variability is common on construction projects and must be managed effectively. New management thinking, like that of lean production, has suggested that better labor and cost performance can be achieved by reducing output variability. Efforts to utilize lean thinking in construction, so far, have generated limited evidence to support this claim. This paper investigates the relationship between variability and project performance to test the notion that reducing output variability will result in improved labor performance. Using productivity data from concrete formwork activities on multiple projects, various measures of output variability are tested against construction performance. It is shown that variability in output is inevitable and that there is little correlation between output variability and project performance, but that variability in labor productivity is closely correlated to project performance. It is concluded that lean improvement initiatives should be redirected to adaptable workforce management capabilities to reduce variability in labor productivity instead of output in order to improve project performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction projects; personnel management; project management; variability
Index terms: personnel, lean construction, lean production, evidence, construction project, concrete formwork, cost performance, construction performance, productivity, project performance, labour productivity, project management, variability
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, construction methods, performance assessment, economics, manufacturing engineering, management, project management theory and practice, production management, building construction, statistical analysis
Topics: Site Management, Human Resources, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here