Documenting and analyzing construction failures

Yates, J K and Lockley, E E (2002) Documenting and analyzing construction failures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(1), pp. 8-17. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A research project was conducted to explore construction failure investigation techniques and processes to determine whether they were adequate and to develop failure investigation guidelines. Data was collected on failures and failure investigation techniques from surveying 115 members of the engineering and construction industry. Construction failure case studies were created using documentation provided by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, state offices of safety and health, and forensic engineers. The construction failure case studies were analyzed to determine how these organizations conduct their investigations and to develop guidelines that can be used for construction failure investigations. This article provides: (1) description of the methods used for the research; (2) results obtained from the industry survey; (3) summary of the results of an investigation into case studies on construction failures; (4) analysis of the results; (5) discussion on construction failure investigative techniques; (6) guidelines developed during the research project for investigating and documenting failures; and (7) recommended format for reporting the findings of failure investigations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: documentation; structural failures
Index terms: case study, engineer, investigation, occupational safety and health, construction industry, surveying, survey, documentation
Subjects: profession, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, professional development, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here