Anand, K B and Ramamurthy, K (2003) Laboratory-based productivity study on alternative masonry systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(3), pp. 237-242. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Masonry construction over the last century has undergone radical changes that have led to specific improvements in construction performance due to the advent of large-sized blocks, innovative methods like surface-bonded masonry, partially grouted masonry, and dry-stacked/mortarless masonry using interlocking blocks. This paper outlines relative productivity assessment of conventional and interlocking-block masonry with different construction methods. To measure the utilization of time by the members of the team, work sampling (adopting the 5 min rating technique) was used. The frequencies of occurrences of each work category, namely direct, indirect, and noncontributory, have been established. Due to the variation in the noncontributory work component for different methods of construction, the net output has been expressed as output per productive hour. Productivity enhancement of 80-120% was observed for dry-stacked masonry and 60-90% more for thin-jointed and mortar-bedded interlocking-block masonry than that of conventional masonry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | blocks; bricks; laboratory tests; masonry; productivity |
| Index terms: | variation, interlocking block, laboratory, construction method, sampling, mortars (material), productivity, construction performance |
| Subjects: | research management, building construction, contractual condition, management, performance assessment, building materials, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here