Implications of even flow production methodology for U.S. Housing industry

Bashford, H H; Sawhney, A; Walsh, K D and Kot, K (2003) Implications of even flow production methodology for U.S. Housing industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(3), pp. 330-332. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Production building in the residential sector is often described as the portion of the construction industry that is most like the manufacturing sector. In modern tract construction in the United States, a small number of models are generally repeated several times in a relatively confined area, using specialized trade contractors to complete each phase of each home. Management of the handoffs between predecessor and successor trade contractors is therefore a critical component in the successful completion of a residential project. In order to bring more reliable planning to this process, a workflow-leveling strategy known as even flow production has come into use in the industry in recent years. Even flow production is a strategy intended to reduce the variability in the workflow for trade contractors in the process, thereby gaining production efficiencies. In practice, different operational definitions are in use. This paper describes a series of simulation experiments to identify the management implications of two common strategies (activity-based versus start-based). A special-purpose simulation template was built for the Simphony environment for this purpose. The pace chosen for the flow of activities was found to significantly affect the speed at which the subdivision was completed. The even flow strategy was found to affect the subdivision completion time only slightly, but to have a significant impact on workflow variability and management effort. Control of the pace of starts of only the first activity exhibited nearly the same degree of variability as if the pace of starts were matched to a sales pace.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; residential; project management
Index terms: strategy, United States, trade contractor, housing, workflow, completion time, residential project, methodology, simulation experiment, efficiency, variability, project management, construction industry, successor
Subjects: statistical analysis, industry analysis, project controls, project management theory and practice, Geography, research methods, performance management, economic development, management, modelling and simulation, operations research, practitioner, construction type
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here