Cheng, M Y and Tsai, M H (2003) Reengineering of construction management process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 105-114. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Applying the business process engineering philosophy, this study focuses on developing a construction management process reengineering (CMPR) method to improve the efficiency of construction management. The CMPR method includes four phases, namely, process representation, process transformation, process evaluation, and reengineering activity. Using CMPR, inefficient operations within a construction company working process can not only be identified, but a new rational operation process can also be developed to improve management efficiency. In this way, the competitive ability of a construction company is also increased. This study argues for the need of a new research agenda in construction management in general. This is illustrated by information technology within construction - in particular, by examining the potential application of the reengineering philosophy. The research possibilities are identified and tested based on the implementation of the CMPR method. To some extent, this study establishes a new agenda of process reengineering for future research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; management methods |
| Index terms: | research agenda, construction company, implementation, management method, information technology, efficiency, philosophy, transformation |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, research management, business, management, organization, performance management, computing systems, philosophical studies |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Procurement, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here