Evaluation of high-density polyethylene pipe installed using horizontal directional drilling

Colwell, D A F and Ariaratnam, S T (2003) Evaluation of high-density polyethylene pipe installed using horizontal directional drilling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 47-55. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper presents the results of field installations of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) using the horizontal directional drilling process. One each of 114 mm (4 in.) diameter standard dimension ratio (SDR) 17 HDPE pipe, 219 mm (8 in.) diameter SDR 17 HDPE pipe, and 324 mm (12 in.) diameter SDR 17 HDPE pipe were installed in a cohesionless soil medium. Various testing parameters were captured during the pullback phase of these three installations. These testing parameters consisted of utilizing pressure transducers to capture the pullback and rotational pressures on the drilling rig, installing linear potentiometers inside the HDPE pipe to measure the axial strain on the pipe, and applying an external load cell to quantify the loading on the pipe during the pullback phase. Comparisons of the pullback and rotational pressure on the drilling rig, loading on the HDPE pipe, and average and maximum strain experienced by the HDPE pipe are presented with respect to the installed pipe diameter.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: drilling; installation; pipes
Index terms: loading, dimension, testing, density, drilling, pressure transducer
Subjects: building construction, computer vision, analytical methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, professional practice, construction operations
Topics: Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Site Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here