Controlled concrete demolition using expansive cracking agents

Gambatese, J A (2003) Controlled concrete demolition using expansive cracking agents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 98-104. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The demolition of concrete is a common part of many renovation and rehabilitation projects in the construction industry. Traditional means for demolishing concrete include the use of jackhammers, explosives, and high-pressure water blasting. On some projects, it may be required to confine the demolition to a small portion of the structure or to a shallow depth on a concrete member. If this is the case, the use of traditional demolition methods may not be feasible or may require special precautions and procedures. A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the use of a soundless chemical demolition agent (SCDA) for performing controlled concrete demolition on a small scale. SCDAs are dry, powdery materials that expand considerably when mixed with water. The agents have traditionally been used for large demolition applications such as for mining and for breaking up foundations. The study examined the performance of SCDA on a small scale, placing SCDA in holes 6.35 mm (1/4 in.) in diameter and less. The results of the study indicate that SCDA can be used on a small scale to create the controlled cracking of concrete. Using SCDA in this manner can be useful for undertaking controlled demolition without excessive vibrations, loud noise, or water. Examples of useful applications include removing just the cover from concrete structures and demolishing sections of concrete features that are of architectural or historic significance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete; demolition
Index terms: agent, rehabilitation project, vibration, renovation, mining, placing, small scale, construction industry, foundations, concrete structure
Subjects: industry analysis, geotechnical engineering, health conditions and diseases, production management, structural engineering, concrete and cementitious materials, renovation and retrofit, practitioner, mechanical systems
Topics: Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here