Harmon, K M J (2003) Effectiveness of dispute review boards. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(6), pp. 674-679. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A Dispute Review Board (DRB) is a panel of three respected, experienced industry professionals jointly selected by the owner and contractor of a project and established at the beginning of a construction project. It meets regularly at the job site to be briefed on the work, the schedule, and any potential issues in dispute. With the use of DRB growing, a pilot study was undertaken to determine the attitudes of industry members concerning its effectiveness in preventing and contemporaneously resolving disputes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractors; dispute resolution |
| Index terms: | dispute, owner, resolution, effectiveness, construction project |
| Subjects: | production management, performance management, conflict resolution, sociology, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here