Quality, environmental, and health and safety management systems for construction engineering

Koehn, E and Datta, N K (2003) Quality, environmental, and health and safety management systems for construction engineering. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5), pp. 562-569. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The philosophy behind quality, environmental, and safety (QES) management systems is a concept that has been accepted by various contractors. Furthermore, a process has been developed insuring that the output produced conforms to customer satisfaction without violating any environmental, health, and safety rules and regulations. An effective QES program not only assures a quality product but also reduces costs, and enhances productivity. It is a top down process, i.e., top management together with line management and other employees develop the program and motivate all personnel to accept the process. Important functions to take under consideration are (1) explain and clarify the quality, environmental, and safety performance expected; (2) involve employees in decision-making and problem solving; (3) describe the consequences of poor quality and unsafe/unhealthy work conditions; (4) establish QES goals and provide feedback on performance; (5) provide a self-monitoring system; and (6) recognize and reinforce good performance and develop a reward system. This paper presents a discussion of the development of a portion of a QES management system which has been employed by a medium to large size construction company. In particular, Items 1-4, listed above, are described in detail.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction engineering; contractors; environmental issues; health hazards; quality control; safety
Index terms: construction company, philosophy, health hazard, personnel, environmental issue, management system, safety performance, program, top management, decision-making, problem solving, regulation, productivity, quality control, health and safety management, monitoring, construction engineering, reward system, customer satisfaction
Subjects: control systems, environmental issues, organization, project delivery, service delivery, health safety and environment, engineering methods, software systems, decision-making and reasoning, management, environmental hazards, political science, philosophical studies, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Human Resources, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here