Comparative performance evaluation of tele-operated pipe laying

Lee, J; Lorenc, S J and Bernold, L E (2003) Comparative performance evaluation of tele-operated pipe laying. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 32-40. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Excavation, in particular, trenching, presents a hazardous working environment for workers. Many deadly accidents still occur even though the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has increased its training for safe trenching. The work presented in this paper originated with the belief that the best approach to remedy this problem is technology. Its premise is the need to remove the workers from this deadly trap and replace them with a mechanical device capable of doing the work necessary to lay pipes accurately. Presented is the result of a comparative field evaluation designed to prove that such a technology is not only technically feasible, but also cost-effective. For this purpose, a tele-operated pipe manipulator was built, capable of being easily attached to an excavator bucket and controllable from the safety of an operator cabin. The new technology was subsequently evaluated during field tests using both qualitative and quantitative performance criteria. Data from the study clearly demonstrate that this technological intervention not only works as intended, but also promises to reduce the cost of installing pipes, especially with increasing trench depths.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: installation; occupational safety; performance evaluation; pipes; productivity; trenching
Index terms: field test, occupational safety, performance criteria, performance evaluation, occupational safety and health, excavation, new technology, productivity
Subjects: management, construction operations, occupational health and safety management, innovation and technology management, performance measurement, data collection methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Site Management, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here