Marzouk, M and Moselhi, O (2003) Object-oriented simulation model for earthmoving operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(2), pp. 173-181. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a simulation engine, developed to model earthmoving operations. The engine has been designed utilizing object-oriented features, and it represents a main component in a newly developed automated system for selecting a near-optimum fleet configuration. It provides contractors with a vehicle for estimating the time and cost of this class of projects considering different practical scenarios. The system has been implemented in a Microsoft environment to facilitate integration among its components, which have been developed in the same environment. The paper focuses on the modeling aspects of the simulation process using discrete event simulation and object orientation. A numerical example of an actual case is analyzed to validate the developed simulation engine and demonstrate its capabilities. The results are compared to those generated using Caterpillar software (FPC). The engine and FPC recommended the same fleet and their estimated project durations were very close, with a difference less than 8%. Unlike FPC, the developed engine, however, can model and account for uncertainty during the execution of earthmoving operations in a reliable manner.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | earthmoving; simulation models |
| Index terms: | discrete event simulation, duration, earthmoving, modelling, estimating, configuration, integration |
| Subjects: | project controls, organizational analysis, systems engineering, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, financial and cost management, construction operations |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here