Minchin, R E and Thomas, H R (2003) Validation of vibration-based onboard asphalt density measuring system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 1-7. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The nuclear density gauge served the industry well for almost forty years as project owners performed quality control on the asphalt paving and compaction process. Recently, however, the responsibility for quality control of these processes has largely been given to the contractor. This shift in responsibility comes at a particularly unfavorable time for the average paving contractor. The construction industry is faced with the worst labor shortage in history, limiting the number of qualified quality control technicians and equipment operators. In addition, this is the dawn of the age of Superpave, a family of hot-mix asphalt mixes designed to combat pavement rutting by increasing the quantity of large aggregate in the mixes. Understandably, these are more difficult to compact. The Onboard Density Measuring System, a model patented by Penn State University, offers density measurements in real time at a rate of one per second during the compaction process, thereby affording the constructor the opportunity to recognize and correct compaction problems immediately while maintaining a permanent record of the entire compaction process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | acceleration; asphalts; compaction; density |
| Index terms: | acceleration, quality control, construction industry, labour shortage, real time, aggregate, owner, density, vibration, history, validation, paving |
| Subjects: | economics, professional development, project controls, sociology, industry analysis, transportation engineering, mechanical systems, materials science, analytical methods, project delivery, architectural and construction history |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Time Control, Urban Studies, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here