Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction

Mohamed, S (2003) Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 80-88. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper promotes adopting the balanced scorecard tool to benchmark organizational safety culture in construction. It argues that this tool has the potential to provide a medium to translate the organization's safety policy into a clear set of goals across four perspectives: management, operational, customer, and learning. These goals are then further translated into a system of performance measures that could effectively communicate a powerful strategic focus on safety to the entire organization. Four perspectives have been developed to represent all stakeholders, thereby ensuring that a holistic view of safety is used for strategic reflection and implementation. The paper argues that by selecting and evaluating the appropriate measures, in each perspective, requirements can be identified, and actions to the identified goals can be aligned and facilitated. The proposed balanced scorecard approach should therefore enable construction organizations to pursue incremental safety performance improvements. Work-in-progress is briefly reported to give insight into the potential applicability of this approach.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benchmarks; organizations; safety
Index terms: implementation, reflection, organizational safety culture, construction organization, balanced scorecard, safety performance, benchmarking, scorecard, performance measure
Subjects: organization, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, professional development, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Procurement, Information Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here