Moselhi, O and Hassanein, A (2003) Optimized scheduling of linear projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(6), pp. 664-673. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a model, designed to optimize scheduling of linear projects. The model employs a two-state-variable, N-stage, dynamic programming formulation, coupled with a set of heuristic rules. The model is resource-driven, and incorporates both repetitive and nonrepetitive activities in the optimization process to generate practical and near-optimal schedules. The model optimizes either project construction duration, total cost, or their combined impact for what is known as cost-plus-time bidding, also referred to as A+B bidding. The model has a number of interesting and practical features. It supports multiple crews to work simultaneously on any activity, while accounting for: (1) multiple successors and predecessors with specified lead and lag times; (2) the impact of transverse obstructions, such as rivers and creeks, on crew assignments and associated time and cost; (3) the effect of inclement weather and learning curve on crew productivity; and (4) variations in quantities of work in repetitive activities from one unit to another. The model is implemented in a prototype software that operates in Windows® environment. It is developed utilizing object-oriented programming, and provides for automated data entry. Several graphical and tabular output reports can be generated, An example project, drawn from the literature, is analyzed to demonstrate the features of the developed model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dynamic programming; models; optimization; scheduling |
| Index terms: | duration, cost-plus, dynamic programming, successor, heuristic, crew productivity, weather, bidding, accounting, programming, variation, window, prototype, scheduling |
| Subjects: | project controls, management, architectural elements, algorithms, contractual condition, modelling and simulation, operations research, contractual arrangements, bidding, economic analysis, risk assessment, air quality, programming |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Time Control, Site Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here