Can labor inputs be measured and controlled automatically?

Navon, R and Goldschmidt, E (2003) Can labor inputs be measured and controlled automatically? Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(4), pp. 437-445. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Real-time control of on-site construction is a growing field still in its infancy. Labor inputs is an important project performance indicator to be controlled because it is a leading input in construction projects. A model for automated control was developed and verified in the field, to demonstrate that labor inputs can be automatically measured and controlled. The concept behind this development is that indirect data - workers' locations measured automatically at regular time intervals - can be collected automatically and converted into labor inputs using computerized algorithms. The model was implemented in a concept-proving prototype, which was applied in three construction projects to verify the concept and test the feasibility of developing a full-scale prototype. The encouraging results of the field experiments showed that it is possible to convert worker's locations automatically measured at regular time intervals into labor inputs, and thus automatically control them. The expected accuracy of such a system is ± 10-20%. Additional work is currently underway to develop a location measurement system and other components of the full-scale prototype.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: automation; benchmarks; data collection; labor; performance evaluation; project management
Index terms: experiment, accuracy, prototype, construction project, performance evaluation, time control, project performance, project management, automation
Subjects: data collection methods, modelling and simulation, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, professional development, automation and robotics, production management, project controls
Topics: Digital Applications, Quality Management, Time Control, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here