Park, K; Hwang, Y; Seo, S and Seo, H (2003) Quantitative assessment of environmental impacts on life cycle of highways. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 25-31. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Several representative environmental loads emitted from the life cycle of highways, which form one of the major infrastructure sectors, were estimated. The life cycle of highways was divided into four stages - manufacturing of construction materials, construction, maintenance/repair, and the demolition/recycling stage. Energy consumption in each life cycle stage was quantified, and environmental load was estimated by applying the environmental emissions factor per each energy source. As a result, it is estimated that the most energy was consumed in the manufacturing stage of construction materials, with consumption of 1,525.8 tons of oil equivalent (TOE) per functional unit (1 km and four lanes of highway). Energy consumption in the maintenance and repair stage was also relatively high among the life cycle stages; the next highest consumption was for the construction and demolition stage. Through the whole life cycle of 20 years, 2,676.8 TOE of energy per functional unit was consumed, and this corresponds to SO2, NOx, and CO2 emissions of 62.1 tons, 17.1 tons, and 2,438.5 T-C, respectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | environmental impacts; highways; life cycles |
| Index terms: | construction and demolition, environmental impact, energy source, repair, consumption, infrastructure sector, CO2 emissions, whole life cycle, life cycle, recycling, construction material, energy consumption |
| Subjects: | building materials, energy systems, air quality, value management, consumer economics, environmental impact, waste management, industry analysis, maintenance engineering, sustainability assessment |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here