Pavitt, T C and Gibb, A G F (2003) Interface management within construction: In particular, building facade. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), pp. 8-15. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper discusses the need for interface management within construction, with particular reference to building facade interfaces. It categorizes the three different types of interface management - physical, contractual, and organizational. The implication of interface management in construction contracting is discussed; it is explained how the U.K. procurement trends have changed, affecting the interface management within projects. U.K. cladding procurement is very fragmented, and the paper maps the development of a typical cladding system showing the complexities of interface management. Finally, the paper discusses CladdISS, a U.K. government funded research project to develop a standardized strategy for the design and management of window and cladding interfaces. It explains the principles of CladdISS with reference to process maps, action plans, management strategy, bibliography, advice on standards, materials, maintenance, joints, movement, and tolerances. This will enable strategies to be developed to avoid the endemic interface problems occurring on-site. It will also guide the management of the interfaces throughout the project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; management methods |
| Index terms: | management strategy, cladding, movement, maps, strategy, window, management method, interface problem, interface management, complexity |
| Subjects: | health behaviours and lifestyles, business, engineering problems, building materials, spatial and geospatial analysis, architectural elements, management, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here