Process and case illustration of construction innovation

Abd El Halim, A E H O and Haas, R (2004) Process and case illustration of construction innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(4), pp. 570-575. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper describes the major stages and component steps leading to the realization of the technical and commercial potential of a new construction technology. It encompasses a process of innovation and invention, which is generically applicable to any construction innovation. A case illustration of a new asphalt compaction technology is also described within each stage to provide a "real life" example. Motivation for the new technology came from the fact that existing, conventional rollers can cause serious damage to the compacted asphalt mat at the time of construction. This damage is in the form of construction cracks, often termed "roller checking", which can result in accelerated, in-service deterioration. The new technology originally termed the "Asphalt Multi Integrated Roller" (AMIR), overcomes the problems of current rollers through stiffness compatibility with the asphalt mix and a different geometry than conventional rollers. Commercial realization of the technology has been achieved through a new generation of AMIR, termed "HIPAC." The paper also provides background on the issues of concern to pavement engineers, including limitations of current compaction methods. It explains in functional terms the unique difference provided by the new technology. As well, it describes the major hurdles that were overcome to achieve commercial realization.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction methods; innovation; pavements
Index terms: construction innovation, construction method, motivation, deterioration, construction technology, engineer, new technology, geometry
Subjects: profession, mathematical modelling, digital engineering, innovation and technology management, material degradation and durability, psychology, building construction
Topics: Roles and Professions, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Site Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here