Smith, S and Roy, R (2002) Product configuration in the house-building industry. In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.
Abstract
The UK house-building industry has often been criticized for failing to meet the housing needs of the country with the relatively narrow range of its products. There have been calls for the sector to adopt the concept of mass customization, which sees the convergence of the distinct approaches of mass production and custom-build industries to bring the benefits of wide-ranging product choice efficiently and economically to the mass market. For a customer to be truly involved in the definition of the product, the design process has to be extended to include the sales and service functions, and the customer interface has to be accordingly re-engineered. For a complex product like a house, effective communication of options available, the accurate and efficient capture of the choices made and their translation into build requirement can be a difficult process. The paper presents work on the development of a home configuration system to support the different stages of the house-buying process – pre-sales research by the customer, product selection and its translation into a format that the business can utilize for order fulfilment. The system aids the selection process with a flexible but robust way of navigating through the choices and with product visualization.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | house building; customization; information management; product configuration |
| Index terms: | customization, product configuration, buying process, design process, building industry, configuration, housing need, mass customization, visualization, option |
| Subjects: | design methods, construction manufacturing, manufacturing engineering, design practice, buying, systems engineering, industry analysis, decision analysis, housing and residential development |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here