Chan, A P C; Chan, D W M; Chiang, Y H; Tang, B S; Chan, E H W and Ho, K S K (2004) Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(2), pp. 188-198. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The construction industry is a very competitive high-risk business. Many problems, such as little cooperation, lack of trust, and ineffective communication resulting in adversarial relationships between contracting parties, are facing the construction industry. Partnering is perhaps one of the most innovative developments in delivering a project efficiently and reducing construction disputes. It provides a sound basis for a "win-win" climate and synergistic teamwork. Project partnering in the Hong Kong construction industry has gained in popularity since 1994. A number of potential factors contributing to partnering success have emerged and deserve further study. This paper presents a review of the development of the partnering concept in general and identifies critical success factors for partnering projects from the Hong Kong perspective in particular. Through a postal questionnaire survey geared toward project participants with hands-on partnering experience, the opinions of various parties - clients, consultants, and contractors were sought and evaluated in relation to partnering success factors. The relationship between the perception of partnering success and a set of success factors hypothesized in the study was derived using factor analysis and multiple regression. The results indicated that certain requirements must be met for partnering to succeed. In particular, the establishment and communication of a conflict resolution strategy, a willingness to share resources among project participants, a clear definition of responsibilities, a commitment to a win-win attitude, and regular monitoring of partnering process were believed to be the significant underlying factors for partnering success. Such an identification of success factors could well formulate effective strategies for minimizing construction conflicts and improving project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | factor analysis; Hong Kong; multiple regressions; partnerships; teamwork |
| Index terms: | cooperation, construction dispute, factor analysis, multiple-regression, Hong Kong, survey, partnering, success factor, construction industry, conflict resolution, critical success factor, construction project, strategy, contracting party, teamwork, partnership, commitment, project performance, monitoring, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | partnership management, psychology, Geography, statistical analysis, control systems, data collection methods, management, conflict resolution, industry analysis, production management, project management theory and practice, dispute resolution, practitioner, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here