Cho, Y K; Haas, C T; Sreenivasan, S V and Liapi, K (2004) Position error modeling for automated construction manipulators. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), pp. 50-58. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Hydraulically actuated construction equipment is rapidly being retrofitted with robotic control capabilities by several major manufacturers. However, position control errors caused by several factors are significant in these types of construction equipment. Errors are amplified if the manipulator and its operator must measure and locate objects in the equipment's fixed reference frame. Both mechanistic and statistical approaches to correcting position errors are possible. A statistical approach is reported here that is validated based on experiments with a computer-controlled large-scale manipulator (LSM). The LSM is sufficiently representative of several types of construction equipment to be able to serve as a general test bed. In the regression analysis, three factors which are measurable in real time: distance, hydraulic pressure, and payload, were varied to determine their influence on position errors in the LSM. It was shown that with an integrated multivariable regression model, about 30% of the mean positioning error of the LSM can be reduced without the use of fixed external reference systems. The model can be implemented as simple, real-time regression equations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; errors; kinematics; models; regression analysis; sensors |
| Index terms: | manufacturer, experiment, real time, hydraulic, automation, modelling, regression analysis, regression model, construction equipment, automated construction |
| Subjects: | project controls, statistical analysis, automation and robotics, construction equipment, analytical methods, fluid mechanics, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Plant and Equipment, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here