Decision support system for microtunneling applications

Chung, T H; Abraham, D M and Gokhale, S B (2004) Decision support system for microtunneling applications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(6), pp. 835-843. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Microtunneling is a trenchless technology method used for installing new pipelines. The inherent advantages of this method over open-cut trenching have led to its increasing use since its first introduction into North America in the early 1980s. With this technology, surface disruption can be minimized, especially in urban areas, and high accuracy of installation (usually less than 2 cm over 100 m) can be achieved in both line and grade. But microtunneling machines are very expensive and few contractors have extensive experience with this technology. Microtunneling can also be risky when unexpected obstacles or soil changes occur. Careful constructability analysis is needed, and an appropriate microtunneling method should be selected in order to achieve successful completion of microtunneling projects. A computerized decision support system (DSS) for microtunneling was developed to support decision making for contractors who want to bid on microtunneling projects. This paper discusses the decision-making process for microtunneling and the development of the DSS. When the user enters basic information about the potential project such as drive length, installation depth, pipe diameter, and soil condition, the DSS evaluates whether microtunneling will be economically feasible and suggests appropriate types of microtunneling methods. The user can then select microtunneling machines, types of pipes, and types of shaft construction methods. This DSS is most beneficial when used at the preplanning stage by utility contractors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: decision support systems; economic factors; microtunneling; pipelines; soil conditions
Index terms: economic factor, accuracy, constructability, construction method, decision-making process, decision support, urban area, decision-making, microtunneling, pipeline
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, economic concepts, urban form and morphology, professional development, building construction, decision analysis, construction integration, geotechnical engineering
Topics: Site Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here