Module-based construction schedule administration for public infrastructure agencies

Dzeng, R J; Wang, W C and Tserng, H P (2004) Module-based construction schedule administration for public infrastructure agencies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), pp. 5-14. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Infrastructure projects such as the construction of expressways are often distributed over different regions and must therefore be divided into several tendering packages. The public agencies that administrate such projects manage project packages that must be integrated. All project packages may involve similar work. However, they are carried out by different contractors each with their own scheduling practices. Standardization provides a foundation for more efficient and effective schedule integration, but cannot easily be enforced without objections from contractors. This paper presents a three-stage standardization implementation framework using modularization. A set of network modules that involve normal, repetitive, cyclic, and merging activities was developed for expressway projects. Two computer systems were developed to help contractors use these modules to create schedules, and to help the owner review schedules submitted by contractors. Experiments and a survey were also carried out to validate the proposed framework, demonstrating a significant amount of time saving and errors reduced by using network modules.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: computer applications; government agencies; infrastructure; project management; scheduling
Index terms: integration, agency, computer system, government agency, scheduling, survey, experiment, modularization, standardization, time saving, module, infrastructure project, implementation, project management, package, public infrastructure, computer application, owner
Subjects: administrative law, infrastructure and transport systems, time analysis, organizational analysis, building construction, sociology, project management theory and practice, architectural elements, performance measurement, software systems, contractual arrangements, operations research, computing systems, data collection methods
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here