Benchmarking studies on construction safety management in China

Fang, D P; Huang, X Y and Hinze, J (2004) Benchmarking studies on construction safety management in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(3), pp. 424-432. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper presents information by which to measure safety management performance on construction sites. In China, the conventional construction safety benchmarking approach is to assess safety performance by evaluating the physical safety conditions on site as well as the accident records, while no attention has been paid to the management factors that influence site safety. This paper is to identify the key factors that influence safety management and to develop a method for measuring safety management performance on construction sites. Based on the survey and interview data collected on safety management factors in 82 construction projects in China, the safety management index as a means to evaluate real-time safety management performance by measuring key management factors was developed. The quantified factors were compared with the commonly accepted physical safety performance index, which was derived from inspection records of physical safety conditions, accident rates, and the satisfaction of the project management team. Multifactor linear regression was conducted and the result indicates that safety management performance on site is closely related to organizational factors, economic factors, and factors related to the relationship between management and labor on site. Based on this benchmarking study, a practical safety assessment method was developed and then implemented on six construction projects. The results show that this method can be an effective tool to evaluate safety management on construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benchmarks; China; safety
Index terms: construction project, safety performance, benchmarking, China, construction safety, safety management, interview, survey, construction site, project management team, economic factor, satisfaction, organizational factor, inspection
Subjects: data collection methods, profession, business, project delivery, work location, production management, economic concepts, Geography, performance measurement, environmental health, quality assurance, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Site Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here