Calculating roller requirements for chip seal projects

Gransberg, D D; Karaca, I and Senadheera, S (2004) Calculating roller requirements for chip seal projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(3), pp. 378-384. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper details a mathematical algorithm to determine the required number of rollers for a chip seal project's equipment spread based on maximizing the asphalt distributor's production and adhering to specified roller time requirements. The paper reports one of the findings of a three-year constructability review of the Texas Department of Transportation's statewide seal coat program. One of the findings of that study was that there was a correlation between the number of rollers used on a job and the loss of aggregate after construction was completed. The roller is the tool used to seat the aggregate and create embedment in the asphaltic binder. Thus, the failure to achieve design embedment depth is primarily a function of achieving quality control requirements for roller linger time. The paper illustrates a straightforward method to calculate the required number rollers to achieve both maximum productivity for the chip seal paving train and to ensure a uniform distribution of roller coverage across the width of the shot. The paper concludes that designing the roller spread is in the best interests of both the chip seal contractor and the owner.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: constructability; construction equipment; productivity; sealing
Index terms: paving, program, construction equipment, aggregate, productivity, owner, constructability, quality control
Subjects: materials science, project delivery, construction equipment, management, software systems, construction integration, transportation engineering, sociology
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Plant and Equipment, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here