Hauck, A J; Walker, D H T; Hampson, K D and Peters, R J (2004) Project alliancing at national museum of Australia: collaborative process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), pp. 143-152. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Project alliancing is a new alternative to traditional project delivery systems, especially in the commercial building sector. The Collaborative Process is a theoretical model of people and systems characteristics that are required to reduce the adversarial nature of most construction projects. Although developed separately, both are responses to the same pressures. Project alliancing was just used successfully to complete the National Museum of Australia. This project was analyzed as a case study to determine the extent to which it could be classified as a "collaborative project." Five key elements of The Collaborative Process were reviewed and numerous examples from the management of this project were cited that support the theoretical recommendations of this model. In the case of this project, significant added value was delivered to the client and many innovations resulted from the collective work of the parties to the contract. It was concluded that project alliances for commercial buildings offer many advantages over traditional project delivery systems, which are related to increasing the levels of collaboration among a project management team.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; buildings; contracts; delivery; partnerships; project management |
| Index terms: | Australia, partnership, case study, added value, alliancing, project management, project delivery, collaborative project, project management team, project alliance, construction project, collaboration, commercial building |
| Subjects: | construction type, profession, data collection methods, economic analysis, project delivery, contractual arrangements, management, project management theory and practice, Geography, production management, partnership management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here