Li, K Y K and Chan, A T (2004) Management of radon in tunnel drilling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(5), pp. 699-707. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
According to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) report in 1982, radiation from radon contributes about 50% of all natural radiation sources to the public. The situation is worse in Hong Kong where large area is granitic containing larger amount of uranium when compared to the global mean. Radon level can therefore be on the high side during tunneling especially where poor ventilation is envisaged. This article includes realistic field study of radon in tunnel under construction. A maximum concentration of over 30,000 Bq/m3 was recorded (1 Becquerels per cubic meter is equivalent to 0.027 pico Curies/L). Radon concentration in tunnel environment is found to be related to groundwater ingress, ventilation provision and geology. A review of the current statutory control in Hong Kong is done as well as its comparison with other countries' practices. In fact, the situation can be improved through education, adopting control legislation and more specifically, having a suggested radon management plan in every tunnel drilling project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | drilling; radon; tunnels; ventilation |
| Index terms: | United Nations, Hong Kong, radon, ventilation, groundwater, tunnel, field study, legislation, drilling |
| Subjects: | air quality, legal systems, institutional frameworks, Geography, water management, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental hazards, building construction |
| Topics: | Governance, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here